
while i'm on the topic of movies (and i have cranking through them recently- next, to finally finish the twin peaks series), terry gilliam's the imaginarium of doctor parnassus completely blew my mind. once again, i am in complete disbelief by the fact that it took me this long to see it; however, i do recognize that since november of last year until about a couple of weeks ago, my life has been one confusing, emotionally overwhelming blur of a shit show. suffice it to say that i have been detrimentally out of touch in regards to films and music, and pop culture in general (and the latter i must admit is not much of a loss). but i had blacked out on this one, or i believe i recall being considerably turned off by the buzz and hullabaloo of heath ledger's "tragically stunning" performance, which i am quoting because i imagine some one some where was likely to have deemed it that. he did, after all, suddenly pass away in the midst of filming, about half-way through production. but i do have the tendency to revert back to the mindset of a pretentious, rebellious teenager when it comes to all things "popular", snubbing whatever it may be with a miff and a good, blatant eye-roll. "eat pray love" for instance, no thank you. this new "girl with the dragon tattoo" phenomenon? i don't even know what it is all about, and it still makes me slightly sick. i just imagine hordes of middle aged soccer moms in crocs sitting in circles at book clubs, squealing and gesticulating in between sipping their starbucks skinny vanilla lattes.
now don't get me wrong, though ledger might not have been my favorite actor, he is certainly not on par to the likings of the bored, desperate housewives of america. he was indeed talented and beautiful, and still so very young, but pardon me for saying that post-mortem glorification is a serious peeve of mine. if a person is not worshiped for his or her publicly displayed crafts while they are alive, what is the necessity for immortalizing them once they are gone? was ledger's performance as the joker really all that extraordinary? or were we perhaps tainted by the reality that it was to be his last complete piece of work? in my opinion it was certainly not worthy of an academy award. maybe brokeback mountain pulled some permanent heart strings, or it is very possible that the dark knight evoked a mysterious allure with the general public in the same vein as brandon lee in the crow; the gloom and the darkness, that sort of coincidentally relevant grim and consequential intrigue. i'm sorry, but i was a devout kurt cobain fan before he took a bullet to the head. all in all, i suppose it is better to burn out than to fade away.
regardless of all this business and my asinine refusal to partake in things celebrated, the movie was incredible. i can not remember the last time i was so thoroughly excited during a film...visibly so, cross-eyed, and testing my bladder control to maximum capacity. it was all so beautiful, so visually stimulating- aesthetically pleasing from the costumes and masks, muted color palette and tinting, all with the charm of a late 18th century carnival freak show...and then segueing into the vibrant, psychotropic effect of the imaginative realm. the great christopher plummer and ::drumroll:: TOM WAITS (shown above) playing the devil of all people, and so appropriately so. that sandpaper scratch of a voice, that sinister smirk, the recognition that behind the garb and the character lies a man equally as absurd and eccentric. in all honesty, the sheer sight of him on the big screen thrills me enough to get my blood pumping and my hair standing on end. i suppose that makes me strange also; yes i love that man of mine.






